Hi Everyone,
Very glad I finally re-recorded this lecture from CITD just a few weeks ago. In it, I explore a question that has definitely been on my mind: what happens when disclosure unfolds inside a civilization that is itself becoming unstable?
As I see it, we are living through an era of geopolitical transformation and potential crisis. But it’s more than that. There’s a near-universal loss of trust in institutions. There’s the rapid rise of AI, and information warfare, and just all the accelerating systems of technological control. This is the environment into which UAP disclosure seems to be emerging.
I am not so sure that disclosure will arrive as a single dramatic event. Not saying it can’t be that way, but instead, my take is it will probably be partial, contested, and shaped by the same institutions and incentives that have managed the subject for decades. At the same time, I suggest that we may be making a fundamental mistake by equating disclosure with contact itself. Disclosure is a human process. The phenomenon is something larger. In a sense, this lecture examines where those two realities intersect, and where they diverge.
This version is a bit longer than the one I gave for CITD.
I hope you find this interesting. I’d like to know your thoughts.
Richard
Hi Richard,
I’m commenting in advance of watching your presentation.
To me, one of the crucial issues is, “Who gets to decide that enough disclosure has occurred to make the reality of UAPs official?”
For far too long, the answer has been, “When the government of a major world power confirms it.” Yeah. The same powers that frittered away their post WWII social capital with lie after lie. Think of it this way: You don’t have to force criminals to admit guilt in order to find them guilty. You just need sufficient evidence to allow conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. Think about it: If murderers are understandably reluctant to own up to their crimes, how much more governments with a much longer list of crimes against humanity? What might have been justifiable Cold War concerns in the mid-20th century had long ago turned into the usual desire to hold on to power.
Bless his heart, Spielberg evidently believes that Disclosure Day will occur when the major networks air it. Maybe for the Boomers who still watch the legacy media; for everyone else, it’s the Internet.
Here’s my take: Disclosure occurs when a sufficient number of reasonably awake and aware people conclude that the weight of evidence favors the reality of UAPs piloted or directed by Non-Human Intelligences. Given the practical importance of assessing whether UAP’s and NMI’s are real, the standard should be somewhere between that of a civil proceeding (preponderance of evidence) and a criminal one (beyond a reasonable doubt). Ideally, maybe something like “to a moral certainty” used in determining whether punitive damages apply within a civil lawsuit.
Now, some may be persuaded that extremely advanced technology exists, but believe it’s entirely due to homegrown genius. There’s enough of an overlap with both types of disclosure that this latter group should be welcomed into the tent.
Whether it’s just beyond black budget tech pr BB tech plus NHI’s. I think we have sufficient evidence that we can factor them into geopolitics. We may not know all the details, but we can make educated guesses, keep track of the hits and misses, and gradually come up with a geopolitical model that accurately takes into account *all* the players.
Let’s take a few examples. Consider the war with Iran, ostensibly to curtail their nuclear weapons program. But if we have gained the ability to neutralize nuclear launches, (or if the HNI’s have made it clear that they would neutalize the nukes) then the nuclear issue becomes Kubuki theater. It makes sense that our land-based nuclear missles are poorly maintained because: 1) either we couldn’t launch them anyway, or 2) we’ve got way better weapons for wiping out cities without the fallout, etc.
If we have a super-duper wonder weapon, when would the stakes be high enough to use it? On the one hand, we want to keep our enemies in the dark as long as possible. On the other hand, if our enemies don’t even suspect we have a wonder weapon, then how could they be intimidated by it. I suspect there is a strategic ambiguity with such weapons: our enemies know enough to be intimidated but not enough for our weapon to be imitated.
In the movie “The Intimidation Game”, the British used their knowledge of the German’s code very carefully. They used their knowledge to enable battle victories for the Allies, but not enough to tip the Germans off that their code had been broken. (the headed for the edge of the Bell Curve, so to speak, but not past it.). Perhaps we have a similar situation with BBB weapons: use them discreetly, on occasions where they can do the most good, but not too often.
If the world of geopolitics doesn’t make sense in traditional terms, rather than chalk it up to craziness, see if it makes more sense if we factor in BBB tech and/or NHI’s.
Richard, needless to say, you’re in a particularly good position to do this type of analyses.
Disclosing UFOs and the Paranormal…
“Cowboy change your ways today or with us you will ride
Trying to catch the devil’s herd across these endless skies.”
– Ghostriders In the Sky, Stan Jones 1948
Haven’t you heard? UFO disclosure is just a boomer conspiracy theory to distract from the Epstein files. Like these two things couldn’t both continue forward in the national discussion. Somewhere between Albuquerque, Santa Fe and Los Alamos, they come together. The establishment left has never had the slightest interest in this, and has treated it and its proponents with utter contempt. It doesn’t fit into the world view of collectivizing economic and political power in the hands of the global superstate. What happens if Putin decides to go first on disclosure?
The intersection of UFOs with the “paranormal” seems the trickiest aspect to deal with. So, maybe they just won’t address it. I never saw any association. Things here were always mechanical, sometimes built into conventional airframes, even commercial models. It’s been a daily thing here since 1997. U-2s would suddenly appear in a clear, blue sky. C-17s would stop in mid-air. Other times it’s discs, triangles, spheres, boomerangs or v-shaped craft. If something fell, heavily armed Men In Black Uniforms got on it with helicopters, light planes, SUVs and big, black electronic surveillance vans. They’d fire up the “ball lightning” zero point generator/transmitter they had stashed near the south boundary of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument at night and bring spheres through to charge up. It’s a Hell of a light show and my amp would sound like it was going to explode at 3 am. The generator was small enough to move with an F-350 pickup. They moved it out after I made the mistake of trying to get closer one night. But, somebody opened a big can of paranormal whoop-ass on this remote Utah desert village starting last summer when they began sending spheres through just above the rooftops, and small discs down dirt roads just above ground level. As I went through longer exposure photos, it became clear that there was a whole different level to this. “Ghosts” might describe a fraction of it, and “spirits” more broadly, but much of this doesn’t look human. Some look like Native Americans from long before the Navajo. Many look like Europeans. “Shadow beings” describes some of them. Some are solid black and even wear hats. Most are “shades,” a pale, slightly glowing white, many of which look like people, but who knows from where or when. Some are animals. There’s a mother bear with cubs that keeps turning up, also moose, elk and deer. Guys on horses go flying through. Glowing clouds of mist move across the mesa, even when there is no breeze and conditions don’t permit formation of clouds. Some things look like an eight foot tall praying mantis, others like a cross between reptiles and humans. Some look like the reptiles that owned this place 100 million years ago. I never gave the “wee people” a serious thought. Now, I ask which kind? Some of these things are ghastly and are pissed someone can see them. Others are dressed like they just walked in from 1977 and are excited when they realize they can be seen. The Japanese using steeply pitched roofs to keep the spirits off the pagodas seems well-advised, as does the old practice of covering a mirror when someone in the household dies. It gets too damn busy.
One evening just after sunset, I watched a guy in jeans, boots and a cowboy hat walk across a corral. He walked near a fence post, stopped and turned into a small, dark cloud of mist that disappeared into the post. Small groups of orbs and columns of light would move down the roads. Now, they move through the house. The Men In Black Uniforms are thugs and assholes, but at least they can’t walk through walls. I’ve had clouds of mist engulf me twice. They’ve done it to the dogs and didn’t want to stop. One went blind shortly after. I wasn’t aware of it at the time, but photos show a small shadow being going for my throat, another shows an insect thing trying to cover my head with what resembled a line of silk. I remember absentmindedly brushing my hand over my head and feeling like a small bunch of flakes was brushed off, but nothing was visible.
I’ve accumulated several thousand photos. They pick up some things the unaided eye can’t. Some things just won’t show up in photos, but sometimes the camera view finder shows what the eye can’t see, and even more appears in the photo. Much can’t be photographed straight on, but you can get it if it is reflected in a mirror or a window pane. It’s disturbing to look in the mirror and see a shadow being behind you.
I have had a little luck using lasers and strobe lights to make these things more visible and to run them off. Sometimes, they reveal things that aren’t visible any other way. Some show contempt for this, but others clear out. The problem is that there a so many of them and driving even one out can take time. It’s like fighting the Chinese army with a muzzle loader. If anyone has any suggestions on moving these SOBs out, I could really use a good one.
I have no idea how any of this works. Has plasma tech opened a passage into here from elsewhere? Does plasma tech energize things already here so that they become more visible and active? How much do the guys running the antigravity know about the paranormal part of this? How much does their security organization know? There was quite a lot going on here 3,000-4,000 years ago, but very little since. Did that help layers of past life here to appear? There wasn’t a bridge over the Colorado river, or a paved road into this part of the West until 1958. Some of what we see matches the ancient rock art in the canyons from thousands of years ago, far older than Pueblo and Fremont art, and far more advanced, though modern archeology hasn’t sorted this out yet. A little of it is touted as proof of ancient Egyptians in the Grand Canyon or Aztec treasure near Kanab, which is premature at best. There is rock art here that shows that someone was aware of white people, boats, sailing ships, wheels and old world animals long before Columbus, probably from the Bronze Age Mediterranean. Who knows where they went?
If you think it’s hard talking to the neighbors about UFOs, try this. Like the Navajo, there are now places that I just don’t go to at night. There are things that I just don’t look at because I don’t want to see what I’ve seen before.
“Haven’t you heard? UFO disclosure is just a boomer conspiracy theory to distract from the Epstein files.” Ouch, that hurt! Although I continue to be amazed by the idea that our society can only discuss one thing at a time. The larger irony may be that we have become so polarized and disappointed that almost every subject now gets interpreted as a distraction from some other subject.
I was recently in a discussion with some individuals whom I thought were down to earth and pretty well balanced and able to discuss most issues making good sense. When the topic of ufology was discussed, I was shocked that most of them maintained this topic was for the insane. I was personally attacked as many of the participants in the discussion mearly rolled their eyes.
This topic is like having a discussion about religion or how the Bible was created. In my circle of of association it is best to leave this platform off the table.
wow, interesting. Yes, those people are definitely still out there.
Great lecture!
I’m curious, how did the audience react when you said we shouldn’t be just dismissing insiders? I imagine they were too polite to groan or hiss, but any pushback?
Good question. I did this for them virtually this year, so I didn’t get a read on that. But I suspect a few did. I’d be interested to know.