Hi Everyone,
Yesterday was a busy day for me. I posted that rather long article on the behavior of aerial UFOs 52 years apart: 1952 and 2004. I was really happy to do that. I thought, great! Let’s relax for a few hours. 🙂
Then I saw there was a 5th White House UAP tranche. So that took all of the rest of the day. But in fact, I must say, this was – for me, at least – a fascinating exploration. My personal opinion is that this is the most interesting of all of them so far. I know there are people who are reflexively dismissive of these releases. I understand the feeling. But I just have to say, if that is your opinion, you’re missing something here. It may not be “disclosure.” But that does not negate the information that it does have.
As per usual, most of the recent UAP/UFO cases in the release lack critical identifying data. Some of them do have locations and dates, but there’s still much that is lacking. This has been the case with all of the previous releases as well, and it’s a problem. Independent researchers and the public in general ought to be able to obtain more useful info.
With that caveat, however, what *is* in here is worth our attention. In this video I covered every one of the 41 files in the release. Quite a few were FBI files of recent events, and often multiple FBI files on a single case (witness interviews in pdf form and artist reconstructions in jpeg). So it’s not actually 41 specific events. But even so, there’s a lot to cover. There is a much more full set of video releases connected to the July 15, 2019 USS Omaha incident that Jeremy Corbell leaked a few years ago. That’s the infrared video of an oval object apparently dropping into the Pacific Ocean. The release includes not only that clip, but several others accompanying it. Extremely useful.
Much more. Several CENTCOM clips, all worth looking at. Several outstanding historical documents from the 1940s and later. I discuss it all.
This is an hour-long video for YouTube. My attitude is, someone may or may not like these releases. But if someone wants to know what they contain, this presentation does exactly that. I show nearly all minutes of all video footage, too. Lots to see. I hope you enjoy this.
Richard
Hi Richard,
You may already be familiar with this case, but thought I’d forward this just the same. Note that the author is the same person who made the case for taking UFO’s seriouly in Skeptic magazine.
The Classified Blindspot
From:theclassifiedblindspot@substack.com
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
The Case for Reverse-Engineering Success – Part 1
Brad Sorensen and the Lost Interview
Emile Kinley-Gauthier
Aug 8
Many thanks, Greg. I think I know this interview. Will check it out asap.
[follow up note: yes I do know it. In fact, I discussed it here on this site in 2024, although the new info you are citing is undoubtedly valuable. I’ll check the substack. But here is my earlier treatment of it: https://richarddolanmembers.com/aliens/revisiting-the-1988-alien-reproduction-vehicle/ I noticed that I misspelled Sorensen’s name to Sorenson]
Thx man.