Hi Everyone,
Wow, that event yesterday was LOOONG. Over 7 hours, but I did watch a lot of it. Anyway, I did a short video about it. This is what I wrote for Youtube.
I spent a good portion of the day watching the recent Disclosure Forum in Washington, D.C. If you were expecting dramatic new revelations, you probably would have been disappointed. But after watching the entire event, I came away thinking it was historically important for a different reason. In this analysis, I look beyond the headlines to examine what the forum tells us about the current state of the disclosure movement, the growing role of Congress, the continuing struggle over government transparency, and why we should be careful not to confuse disclosure with understanding the phenomenon itself.
This seems to be part of our daily UFO reality these days. What it will actually lead to is another matter. But we ain’t in Kansas any more. 🙂
Richard
I watched a little over of 5 hours of it. Despite there being no bombshells dropped and the crappy audio I still enjoyed it . Although Richard it would have been a lot better if they had invited you to speak.
I try to follow your lead when it comes to avoiding reactions to headlines and trying to recognize the phenomenon is still being digested by folks inside and outside the Beltway. With this said, I’m curious if you see what other researchers are increasingly seeing with regard to Mellon, Elizando, etc. wanting a narrow brand of disclosure that comes with amnesty and a path to advancing whatever their unsaid agenda is. Handing out awards while ducking questions on topics like the legacy program undermines their credibility. The event seemed structured to advance the threat narrative, controlled disclosure and amnesty. It’s pretty notable that David Grusch doesn’t seem to align with or want to be associated with this faction.
“Mellon, Elizando, etc. wanting a narrow brand of disclosure that comes with amnesty and a path to advancing whatever their unsaid agenda is. Handing out awards while ducking questions on topics like the legacy program undermines their credibility.”
Yes. True. This is something I could have and maybe should have stated. But to my perspective, this problem is so deeply illegal, so deeply embedded, that it’s a minor miracle that they are discussing it at all. And I would ask you and everyone: are the real people “in on it” actually Mellon, Elizondo, Puthoff, and the rest? I would say absolutely no, they are not. At least not in the inner circles. My take is that they have all spent many years working their way through the labyrinth and each discovered in their own time that this UFO subject not only was real but worthy of public discussion.
the question then becomes: how to raise the issue? for years this was utterly toxic and career suicide. only slowly could it be broached. We are still taking baby steps. Many people are frustrated and angry over these small steps. they rightly see the disparity between the reality and what is being said.
My position is that this should not be surprising. And it doesn’t (necessarily) make them “complicit” as some claim. Maybe — maybe they have deeper connections to the coverup than I have suspected. But frankly I do not believe they are the architects or main bemeficiaries of the coverup. They are however career government people who are still trying to cover their asses. Mainly they are *not* interested in blowing up the room. So they go slowly and walk endlessly around the perimeter before moving in closer to the core. and they still have a long way to go.
Thanks for the response, Richard – probably the case that these individuals are more likely tools than architects of the push for controlled disclosure and amnesty. Some of the deep state, BAASS and TTSA crowd may also know tough things about economic, societal and legal ramifications that justify a controlled disclosure model (which happens to align with amnesty being tucked in).
As always, your candor and constructively advancing of the ball in discussions is what makes you the top thought leader in the field.
6/27/2026 6 p.m. CDT
Luis Elizondo was complaining about how “The government hasn’t delivered on UFO disclosure” ….. and then he (or one of his lackeys) just censored me in real time for saying this about his so called “UFO disclosure efforts” :
“The question is, Lue, HAVE YOU DELIVERED? You’re always talking about how you risked your life in the military “for America”. Where is that courage now?”
==================================
Coulthart is everywhere lately as a UFO “diclosure” mouthpiece, not just on NewsNation.
I liked Ross Coulthart for about two weeks until I really understood what he was doing and where he was coming from.
His owners Nexstar Media Group is linked to pro-Israel figures and oligarchs and has received investment from Israeli-based entities, leading to concerns about editorial influence.
Editorial Leadership? Nexstar appointed Jake Novak, the former media director for the Israeli consulate general in New York, as the deputy managing editor of its cable channel, NewsNation. Novak is known for advocating for Israel and criticizing media bias against the country.
Journalist Katie Halper was fired from Nexstar-owned “The Hill’s” show “Rising” in 2022 after she presented a monologue calling Israel an apartheid state, a move critics argued reflected a new pro-Israel editorial stance under Nexstar’s ownership.
Since acquiring Tribune Media in 2019, Nexstar has become the largest local broadcast TV owner in the US, reaching nearly 40% of US television households, which amplifies the potential impact of such editorial decisions.
Perhaps Mr. Coulthart has a good heart, but what he does and who he serves does not serve us OR any kind of honest disclosure. There’s NOTHING in it for them, and if anything about Ross could make a difference, he’d be packing his bags for OZ without a severance package.
Everyone took for granted that UAP are real. And everyone took for granted that everything is firmly in the hands of warmongers and morally bankrupt corporates, and that we ain’t gettin’ nothin’… They all sat around covering their own asses. No important questions were raised or answered.
Why does it seem that you act as such an apologist for this? Why does it seem that you try to justify this? I don’t say these things lightly. I do not wish to be insulting or derogatory towards you, but this whole “it’s a process” thing you’re into and say all the time is just a normalization of what is happening, not quite a “everything’s fine, let’s just move along and let let them do their thing.” After all, it a “maturing” movement. We have to pretend somehow that these people are not what they really are. We have to pretend that even though they ARE what they are, that they will SOMEHOW do what is right, what is good, and that we shall know something SOMEDAY. That we shall have pie-in-the-sky… by-and-by. Be good little boys and girls and let the grown-ups, the “mature” people, handle things.
I’m beginning to feel that we’s all jes’ niggers waitin’ fer them white folks to free the slaves, and the house niggers on this here plantation is a helpin’ them up to the big white folks’ house. We gots ta be PATIENT.
“Why does it seem that you act as such an apologist for this?”
That is absolutely not true. But maybe I’m not a moralist – and perhaps that is your first position. It’s definitely not mine and never has been. As Joe Biden liked to say, “c’mon man!”
I wrote: “Why does it seem that you act as such an apologist for this?”
I used the word “seem” and that’s what it seems like when you normalize and accept these things like the zionist media accepts and normalizes war and genocide. The people presented as “whistleblowers” and heroes that you have not just “objectively” (haha) reported on, but actually LAUDED, are in fact mostly culpable of and worthy of the designation “war criminal” for either their direct or willing support activities. These folks aren’t some sort of office workers or adminstrative personnel. Their history is that of mass-murder and worldwide destruction at the behest of a foreign power and the theft of trillions of dollars from our treasury both overt and covert. How is it somehow “moralizing” to point out CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY? No one needs to be a member of a church or to pass “moral judgement” to be concerned about violations of law in the highest degree possible, i.e. TREASON.
You, yourself, ON THIS VERY PAGE admit that in your reply to Greg Marose that : “this problem is so deeply illegal, so deeply embedded…” but then you let them off the hook and even laud them! How can it not seem as if you are acting as an apologist? How can it not seem that you are normalizing and accepting what are possibly the worst crimes imaginable in exchange for what have so far been FALSE promises of disclosure? That’s a bad deal for everyone, Richard.
This about LAW, not “morals”. If these folks are engaged in covering up deals with NHI and/or the use of advanced technologies by human parties to commit crimes, we are dealing with SURVIVAL issues that CANNOT be pasted over and ignored by using the word “morals” to dodge them.
.
I do not want to think these things about you. I have very few “heroes” in this world and you are one of them. But if you say that “the problem is so deeply illegal” and then ignore, normalize or even laud the people doing it, then you are not only accepting this criminality but lauding the criminals for giving us only promises they have not delivered on and may NEVER deliver on in any honest fashion. You, yourself, have admitted on a number of occasions that we may never get any real disclosure.
I have no questions about your motives. But this seems a little less than really fighting the good fight. We fight the good fight because we see what is right and what is wrong. Is fighting the good fight “moral” because we use the word “good”? Shall we take the word “good” out of the conversation and just say “fight”? If we normalize criminality and accept it in exchange for no more than promises from proven liars, how is that fight “good” in any sense?
Thanks, AG. I don’t think we’re actually very far apart in recognizing that profound illegality has probably occurred. Where we differ is in where we begin the analysis. I don’t start by classifying individuals as criminals or heroes. I start by trying to understand the institutions, incentives, constraints, and evidence before assigning those labels. That’s not an excuse for wrongdoing, nor is it normalization. It’s simply the historical method I’ve tried to apply throughout my career. If the evidence ultimately warrants condemnation, then so be it. But I want my conclusions to follow the evidence, not precede it.
There’s something else, too. History teaches that leaders who insist on moral purity before pursuing political objectives usually accomplish very little. Those who understand institutions, timing, and leverage often achieve more, even while working among deeply flawed people. Obviously laws have probably been broken during this long coverup. If it turns out that contemporary figures like Mellon, Elizondo, Puthoff, or others knowingly committed crimes in the course of it, then by all means they should be held accountable. But I don’t believe guilt should be presumed simply because someone operated within that system.
An’ we all gon’ covert to dat white folks’. RELIGION ! OUR sky gods will be replaced wi’ de new sky gods! Oh happy day! Let’s sing an’ dance an’ try ta not be too sad when dey take our children, when they take US, cause now we goin’ ta white folks’ heaven! We be jes’ like de white folks! They gon’ give up their place above us an’ we all be one big happy family! Ah knows de Colonel an’ his southern aristocrat famly really WANTS to give up de power over us niggers, dat dey want to give up dey position at the top of de heap an share wid all us. Dem white folks is so good an workin so hard, it do bring a tear my eye as I sit down here in de shack. Why, I hear dat dey’s even talkin about it in de congress of dis here United Snakes!
But what iffn some dem sky gods is really debbils or demons? Threatnin’ us niggers and our white masters? Ah knows den dat de best thing w’ be to trust de white folks ta perteck us, not ask no more questions an’ serve dem an’ march in the nigger regiments ta preserve de power of de white folks! Dey PERTECKIN us niggers! We mus’ stay togedder! Seem like it takin’ a L-O-O-O-N-G time, but dem folks up at de big white house an’ de house niggers are doin’ the right thing! Why sure, deys hist’ry is all killin’ an’ enslavin’ millions of us, but dey gon’ change! Dey say dey gon’ free us some day! Oh happy day! Trus’ de process! We gots to! Dem white folks, dey knows things, but we jus’ stupid field niggers not ready fer de white secrets. Dey tell us someday! For now, les’ jus’ be happy an’ trus’ de Colonels on dis big plantation an’ de house niggers. Dey workin’ ta hep alla us niggers! Trus’ dat process! Dey love us an’ want to perteck us, an tellin’ de secrets ‘ud be BAD, real bad. De system dat pertecks us all would be in jeopardy! Ain’t that a fine big word? Jes’ like disclosure. Dat a fine big word, too!
Lue Elizondo’s latest fakery on FB. This looks like a desperate plea for clicks. A super, no, ULTRA fake pic of “Alien Carvings”, somewhere in “Guatemala or Peru.” Disgustingly laughable.
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=122291157314241264
Part of the “mature” “process”?
Hi Richard.
I dont know if disclosure is coming from the gov at all but it seems they make UFO and UAP known to all people. Maybe that is the idea before the main drops come, who knows.
Look into the experience reported by Jonathan Reed. I accidentally run into an interview with him on tubechannel ” caspersight ” and this time I got the goosebumps out of the description of the craft he saw. It is very very similar to the craft that was seen floating above ground during the christmas 1980 case on the US base at Brentwaters UK.
Maybe interview him before it is to late. You have better chance of asking good questions.
Regards and again, happy birthday to both You and Tracey and the cats and USA soon.