Hi Everyone,
The latest WH release of UAP files happened Friday, and I basically spent the weekend trying to catch up. As I have been doing, I went through all of the files. Although reading through the 37 AAWSAP papers was not possible. I did read through as much of 10 or 11 as I could and did describe them in outline form. The rest look very interesting for sure.
The videos once again: interesting visuals for many of them but no way to truly analyze them. Still, some of those objects do not look like any kind drones I can think of. Would like to know your thoughts.
And of course some nice historical material from 1952. Analysis and discussion of the 1952 Tremonton Utah film and a real treat to hear over an hour of Edward Ruppelt give a presentation.
As we all know, these releases are not disclosure. But I continue to feel they are not a waste of time either.
This is what I wrote for YouTube:
The sixth White House UAP release gives us another batch of documents and videos to examine. Some of this material has been public for years, so we need to be clear about what is actually new. In this video, I look at the release and spend some time on the technical studies prepared for AAWSAP, including Eric Davis’s work on advanced propulsion, a fascinating discussion of quantum communication, and much more. What are they proposing? Can any of it be tested? I try to explain these ideas in language the rest of us can follow without losing what makes them interesting. I also look at the sighting material and consider what this release adds to our knowledge, and how far it takes us toward the disclosure so many people are expecting.
Download the UAP files here: https://www.war.gov/UFO/release/06/?releaseDate=Release+06&release=06
Your thoughts — at your convenience, of course! I would like to know your reaction to these files, as well as my portrayal of them.
Richard
Things That Go Bump In the Night…
The Tremonton film was shot in the same month that UFOs were sighted over DC. Tremonton is a little Mormon farm town, just east of the largest, least populated area left in the lower 48 states. The Golden Spike National Monument, the Wendover Bombing Range and the Northrup-Grumman solid fuel rocket motor facility are out there, along with a few, very scattered ranches. Hill AFB is south of Tremonton, and the area frequently has military aircraft. Even in 1952, it would have had radar coverage. Late one night in July 2005 I watched a low-flying sphere elude two F-16s from Hill by zipping into a very narrow canyon in the Wasatch range seconds before the fighters moved in. They were much lower and moving much faster than I’ve seen military planes fly in the area.
There seems to be a real disconnect between what is being discussed theoretically and what we’ve seen demonstrated nightly over the last 29 years along the UT/AZ border. Is it in the hands of the government? It would depend on how you even define government. They get what they need from the Department of the Interior in terms of a lot of land and airspace with some serious privacy. Their enforcers, the Men In Black Uniforms, come heavily armed to make sure that privacy is maintained. They are authorized for deadly force if that’s what it takes to maintain that privacy and control over their equipment. At times, there are malfunctions and pilot error, and that’s when it gets extra interesting.
The zero point plasma toroid (ball lightning) generator/transmitters have been in use here since 2010. They’ve moved the site twice for security reasons. I’m not sure where it is now, but it will be in a canyon with very limited access and visibility. At the first two sites near Coyote Creek canyon in the Grand Staircase National Monument, they kept it cloaked during daylight, but after sunset there’d be a faint glow and suddenly it would be sitting there. Extreme weather, particularly heavy lightning, can create problems for spherical drones and the generator which powers them remotely. Late one night in July, a small but very intense thunderhead moved in above the generator while the MIBUs were operating it. They had to do an emergency shut down of the equipment. When the containment ring around the plasma toroid powered down, the toroid broke free and went flying up a narrow arroyo in the darkness with the MIBUs in pursuit on foot and in trucks. These guys are control freaks, so it’s funny watching them have to scramble. I have 400 hours of video of this malarky, including the runaway plasmoid, that I need to sort out. Right now I’m just trying to sort through 5,000 photos, a lot of which are about the paranormal outbreak that’s been going on here for just over a year. There are some similarities to Sedona and Skinwalker, but we only know what they choose to tell us. Some of it is so much stranger than what is being reported in those places. I suspect some of it goes on across the Colorado river on the Navajo res, and up the Colorado and Green rivers into the Uinta Basin. I have a vague notion that the paranormal stuff is related to the plasma tech that seems to be in use in some of these systems. Cloaking, antigravity, zero point and mass/inertia reduction all appear to be long done deals here. Who controls them is what scares me.
Thank you JurassicRanch for taking the time to describe this. I know you’ve written about activity in your area before, and I take what you’re sharing seriously. There’s much here that I’d like to understand better.
As I understand it, you are describing an organization with access to federal land that is operating highly advanced craft along the Utah–Arizona border, including spherical drones powered remotely by equipment concealed in the canyons. You’ve seen personnel and apparent malfunctions, and you suspect the technology is connected to the unusual experiences occurring nearby. I’m also interested in the possibility that some of these systems use plasma and possibly zero-point energy. And yes, who is running this operation is one of the big question. If I’m missing something here, please fill me in.
The incident involving the luminous ring breaking free during the thunderstorm is very intriguing. Since you mention having video of it, would you be willing to share that sequence, ideally with the original sound and some footage before and after? A date, approximate location, and brief explanation of where you were observing from would help me follow what’s happening. You certainly don’t need to finish sorting 400 hours of footage before we begin with one event.
Also — and I’m not doubting you here, but — how you arrived at the technical identifications? What led you to recognize the equipment as a generator powering the spheres remotely, and specifically as a zero-point system? I’m asking because after just reviewing one of Eric Davis‘s papers in the recent Tranch release, there’s a whole discussion on zero point energy.
If someone else witnessed that same incident, their description would be valuable too. I’d like to give this the careful attention it deserves, beginning with the event you can document most clearly.
Anyway, thanks for your patience in describing what’s going on there. It has to be frustrating to you to hear all of us talking about these things theoretically, and here you are seeing it actually in practice.
Ball lightning or plasma balls or filaments can be produced with pulsed lasers without the use of large toroids or zero point energy (whatever THAT is). BTW, toroids are for fusion research, not ZPE. Fusion powered ZPE seems like an oxymoron. Why would one need a fusion toroid which sucks tremendous energy, to make ZPE? Just asking.
============================
Speech is modulated for “talking plasma” primarily through Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM) or Sigma-Delta (ΣΔ) modulation, where the audio signal controls the energy or density of the laser pulses creating the plasma.
Modulation Mechanisms
Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM) In PAM systems, the instantaneous amplitude of the analog audio signal directly drives an electro-optic modulator (typically a Pockels cell). This device varies the energy of each individual laser pulse in the train proportionally to the audio waveform.
Process: A high-voltage generator applies a voltage to the Pockels cell based on the input audio function $f(x(t))$. This attenuates or passes the laser beam, creating a pulse train where the optical pulse energy correlates linearly (ideally) with the acoustic pulse amplitude.
• Requirement: The laser repetition rate must be at least twice the Nyquist frequency of the audio band (e.g., >40 kHz for full human hearing, though speech often uses ~8–10 kHz).
• Challenge: The physical conversion from laser energy to acoustic pressure is highly non-linear. Simple linear modulation often results in harmonic distortion, requiring computational pre-compensation or non-linear driving functions to achieve intelligible speech.
Sigma-Delta (ΣΔ) Modulation Earlier and alternative systems use digital Sigma-Delta modulation.
• Process: The audio stream is converted into a high-frequency 1-bit or multi-bit stream. Information is encoded in the density of the pulses (Pulse Density Modulation) rather than their varying energy.
• Advantage: This method is more robust against laser energy fluctuations and non-linearities because the laser operates at a fixed energy per pulse, simply turning on or off at extremely high speeds.
• Trade-off: It requires significantly higher laser repetition rates compared to PAM to achieve the same audio bandwidth.
The “Two-Laser” Military Approach (LIPE)
For the Laser-Induced Plasma Effect (LIPE) developed by the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate (JNLWD), the process often involves a dual-laser setup to create intelligible speech at a distance:
1. Plasma Creation: A high-energy femtosecond laser ionizes the air to create a stable plasma ball (the “speaker”).
Modulation: A second laser (often a nanolaser or a modulated continuation of the first) strikes the existing plasma. By rapidly pulsing or modulating this second beam, it causes the plasma to expand and contract at specific audio frequencies.
1. Result: The oscillating plasma generates pressure waves that mimic human speech. Researchers adjust algorithms to target specific frequencies (typically boosting the 3–4 kHz range) to overcome the natural “mumbling” caused by the plasma’s broadband noise and improve intelligibility.
The plasma ball (or filament) generated by lasers is not actively stabilized against wind in the traditional mechanical sense; instead, it relies on inherent physical robustness and high-speed regeneration to withstand atmospheric turbulence.
Inherent Stability of Filaments
Once a femtosecond laser filament is formed, it is remarkably resistant to atmospheric disturbances, including wind and turbulence.
Kerr Effect Dominance: The stability arises because the nonlinear Kerr refractive-index gradients generated within the plasma filament are approximately 100 times stronger than the refractive-index gradients induced by atmospheric turbulence or wind. This self-guiding effect allows the filament to maintain its position and intensity even when propagating through turbulent air.
Post-Formation Robustness: Research indicates that while turbulence can disrupt the formation of a filament (causing beam wander before ionization), a previously formed filament survives crossing turbulent regions with minimal deviation in pointing accuracy or intensity.
Regeneration vs. Static Stabilization
For “talking plasma” systems like LIPE, the “ball” is not a single static object that needs to be held in place against the wind.
• High Repetition Rates: The plasma is generated by laser pulses firing at high frequencies (typically 1 kHz or higher). Each pulse creates a new plasma point at the focal zone.
Continuous Re-creation: Even if wind displaces the residual heat or ions from a previous pulse within milliseconds, the next laser pulse instantly ionizes the air at the precise focal point again. The system effectively re-creates the plasma source faster than the wind can disperse the medium, maintaining a stable acoustic source location as long as the laser beam path remains unobstructed.
Limitations
While the filament itself is robust, extreme atmospheric conditions can still degrade performance:
Beam Path Distortion: Strong turbulence before the focal point can distort the incoming laser beam, potentially shifting the focal zone or preventing filamentation entirely.
• Aerosols and Humidity: Heavy fog, rain, or dust can scatter the laser energy, reducing the intensity reaching the focal point and destabilizing the plasma generation.
Laser-induced plasma generates sound through laser-induced breakdown (LIB), where intense, short laser pulses ionize air or solid targets to create a plasma volume. The rapid thermoelastic expansion and subsequent collapse of this ionized volume produce a shock wave with a characteristic N-pulse pressure profile, which propagates as an audible acoustic wave.
This phenomenon enables several key applications:
• Military Non-Lethal Weapons: The Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate (JNLWD) utilizes the Laser-Induced Plasma Effect (LIPE) to create “talking plasma” that beams intelligible speech or loud deterrent sounds to specific locations without physical speakers.
Laser-Sound Reproduction: Researchers use optoacoustic transduction to digitally modulate laser pulses, allowing for the direct reconstruction of complex audio streams or moving virtual sound sources in space without receivers.
• Scientific Analysis: The acoustic emissions are monitored in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) and materials characterization to analyze ablation processes and sample properties.
The acoustic output varies based on laser parameters; tightly focused nanosecond pulses create omnidirectional point-like sources, while loosely focused femtosecond pulses generate directional, line-like plasma filaments emitting cylindrical waves.
The directionality of laser-induced plasma sound is primarily determined by the geometry of the plasma volume, which is controlled by the laser pulse duration and focusing conditions.
1. Plasma Geometry and Pulse Duration
The shape of the ionized air dictates the acoustic wave propagation pattern:
• Omnidirectional (Point Source): Tightly focused nanosecond pulses create compact, sub-millimeter, point-like plasma sparks. These emit spherical shock waves, resulting in omnidirectional sound radiation across the entire frequency range.
Directional (Line Source): Loosely focused femtosecond pulses undergo self-focusing to form elongated, cylinder-like plasma filaments (ranging from millimeters to meters). These act as acoustic line sources, emitting cylindrical waves that are strongly directional.
2. Directivity Characteristics
For directional plasma filaments, the sound radiation follows specific acoustic line source models:
• Maximum Radiation: Sound pressure is highest perpendicular to the filament axis (90°).
• Suppressed Radiation: Emission is significantly reduced or nullified along the axis of the filament (0° and 180°).
• Frequency Dependence: Directivity increases with frequency; filaments are moderately directional at lower audio frequencies (e.g., 2 kHz) but become highly directional at higher frequencies (e.g., 8–16 kHz).
Effective Length: The degree of directionality depends on the effective length of the plasma channel relative to the sound wavelength; longer filaments produce narrower, more focused beams.
===========
More here:
Mid-Air Tactile Sensations Evoked by Laser-Induced Plasma: A Neurophysiological Study
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.733423/full
The video with 6 possible “drones” appear to possibly be 2 groups of 3 or possibly 2 craft with 3 lights. Another “dot” video looked to me to be actually 3 closely spaced dots.
Triangles.
====================
Aftergood’s response was wierd, considering that he used to rail against classified patents.